Thursday, 25 March 2010
Developing my idea
Thursday, 18 March 2010
Martin Parr Images
Martin Parr
My tutor Steve introduced me to the work of Martin Parr a few weeks ago. Since then, I have been looking into his work and thoroughly enjoy his concept of showing images "as they are". He seems to capture England in a very clever way, highlighting the things we take for granted everyday. He captures most images with hilarity, sometimes seperating the working classes from the middle classes. Some of his work I have come across is quite dark, as though he's trying to send a message to those that look at his work.
Out of the ordinary
Martin Parr reveals beauty in the banal through his photography, and says even mundane objects have charm - you only have to notice them.
As we travel around Britain, I am convinced most of us cannot really appreciate what we are seeing. We take too much for granted, because it is all so familiar.
We float through our cities and countryside with our eyes half closed. However if we go abroad, especially to countries which are very different to our own, our sensibilities are awakened; everything is fresh and exciting. I am proposing that same approach should be rekindled when we look at our own environment.
I have made a career as a Iphotographer and my main subject matter has been the normal; I try to show how extraordinary it really is. I have taken supposedly boring subjects such as supermarkets and the English seaside and shown them as new and appealing.
Most of us, when we go out with a camera in our own country, try to find exotic subject matter to photograph.
I am sure you know what I mean: a glorious sunset, a beautiful old building, the picture postcard view. We are also influenced by expectations of what interesting views or photographs should show: the unusual, the unfamiliar as well as the pretty, cute or beautiful. In fact, everyday objects are unusual, but we are not able to see this clearly.
I want to put forward a case for taking more seriously the everyday object, we should appreciate those objects that are so familiar we usually don't notice them. Take the scarecrow, a wonderful example of outsider art, and made with a real purpose. If you were to say to their farmer creators that they were sculptures, they would look at you as if you were mad. However if you take photos of them in splendid isolation, the results are both compelling and surreal.
There are two categories of everyday objects: those that are constantly changing in terms of design, and those that are reassuringly constant. In the former category, take something as simple as the petrol pump. I photographed one in use in Salford in 1986, and now it looks like it is from another era. What at the time may have been rejected as a photo of great tedium has become a fascinating image.
The benefit of photographing such objects now is that time is on your side. These images will improve with age. The older examples of the everyday become more fascinating in comparison to the modern.
Think also about "timeless" objects. Personally, I love the humble postbox. The simple design, the distinctive colour add up to make this a national icon. For many years now, I have been trying to locate the postboxes with the most stunning backdrops, particularly in the Scottish islands. Here you can find postboxes literally on the beach and at remote and beautiful crossroads. I have also looked for remote phoneboxes, but I believe the postbox has the edge, as it is smaller and visually stronger.
Sadly, the classic red phonebox is in decline and any remaining public phoneboxes are more likely to be the glass and metal variety.
I would urge everyone to start looking at the world in a different way. Spend some time looking at everyday objects, at their design, their shape, their individual characteristics. Think ahead and imagine their significance. Many are interesting and aesthetically pleasing in their own right, if you just give them some attention. And of course, the discipline of taking out a camera and documenting the things around you on film is a great way to start to open your eyes wider.
Reminder!!
Monday, 15 March 2010
Following the Health & Safety Act 1974
The Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 (HSWA 1974) (or Health and Safety at Work (Northern Ireland) Order 1978 (HSWO 1978) applies to every type and place of employment. Should an employer breach any of the principal sections of the act, their employee will have the right to take action.
However, where employees work at a workplace not under their employer's control, their employer has no duty under these regulations, but should (as part of his or her general duties under the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974 or Health and Safety at Work (Northern Ireland) Order 1978) take any steps necessary to ensure that sanitary conveniences and washing facilities will be available. It may be necessary to make arrangements for the use of facilities already provided on site, or to provide temporary facilities. This applies, for example, to those who employ seasonal agricultural workers to work on someone else's land.
The Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 (or Health and Safety at Work (Northern Ireland) Order 1978) creates a duty upon every employer to ensure so far as is reasonably practical, the health, safety and welfare at work of all employees. It also requires any employer who employs five or more people, to prepare a written statement of their health and safety policy.
A health and safety policy should state the general policy of the organisation and the arrangements for carrying it out. Such a statement must be brought to the employees' attention. A copy of the statement should be put up in an obvious place, such as a notice board. This would be regarded as satisfactory compliance with the regulations. Revisions must be made to the statement wherever necessary and be brought to the attention of all employees.
An employer should also consult their employees on health and safety matters. Recognised trade unions provide regulations for appointing safety representatives among employees. It is the duty of every employer to consult with those appointed in order to make and maintain arrangements to enable effective cooperation. This will promote and help to develop measures to ensure the health and safety of all employees.
It is also important that there is a clear policy in place to deal with persons other than employees, including members of the public. The standard of protection will in most cases be similar to that given to employees but sometimes the standard may be higher. This applies to a person visiting the workplace who has less knowledge than the employees working there of the potential hazards and how to avoid them.
Those who design, manufacture, import or supply any article or substance for use at work, must ensure, so far as is reasonably practical, that it is safe and without risks to health. They must also ensure that the article is suitably tested and examined and that adequate information is given about its use. Those who erect or install articles for use at work must also do safety checks.
Changing my mind - FINAL IDEA!!
Meeting the criteria
Magic Lights
Thursday, 11 March 2010
Demonstrating shutter speed
Monday, 1 March 2010
Depth of field examples
The below images show 2 pics of the same penguins.
Depth of field is the amount of distance between the nearest and farthest objects that appear in acceptably sharp focus in a photograph. A preferred selection Depth of field in a focused subject in an image can be quite subjective. Remember this, adequate selection of DOF for one situation, application may be unacceptable for another photographer. It is all a matter of personal preference when trying to determine the appropriate use of DOF to enhance an effect in a photograph.
IMAGE 1
I used a very shallow depth of field for this image and this clearly shows in my image as the penguin nearest to my lense is clearly in focus whilst the penguin behind is out of focus. Images taken with a shallow depth will place more emphasis on objects closest to the camera lens. As follows........
IMAGE 2
I used a DEEPER depth of field on the focus ring hence the subject further away from the lens is in clear focus whilst objects nearer the lens are out of focus as my image clearly shows......